What can we make of Celtic Renewables' performance?
A bit like a jigsaw, this is where we try to pull together all the facts and reports into a cohesive understanding of the company. Nevertheless, a number of questions remain unanswered.
Let's start with the relationship between the two companies
Celtic Renewables Limited is the main 'holding company' and Celtic Renewables Grangemouth Ltd (somehow once a plc) was set us as a subsidiary to report the trading of the first production site.
Period to end 2024, for which reports are available shows that CRG Ltd £3.9m of production costs, £2.35m of administrative costs, operating income of £.62m and debt interest of just over £1m, leaving a loss before taxation of £6.67m. Net liabilities stood at -£24.8m.
Bearing in mind that no product was shipped until 2024.
Celtic Renewables incurred a loss of £4.4m (£5.4m for administrative costs) and net assets of £14.4m at the end of the period.
Income projections
Caledon Plant
In its 25 April 2024 'We are crowdfunding' newsletter the Company stated that has a 3 year offtake agreement with Caldic worth £2-3m for 850 tonnes of product per year. Elsewhere it says that Caldic is its exclusive customer and distributor, somewhere else that there are 40 customers testing the product (do we presume customers of Caldic?) but then elsewhere that the Offtake agreement is for 50% of the production.
But let's just assume Caldic is set to buy £2-3m for 850 tonnes of product. Offset against £3.9m of production costs, £2.35m of admin costs in 2023, and the small scale plant is not sustainable unless the costs are reduced. Energy is supplied to the plant through local renewables. What is the cost of the feed product? Usually this cannot be provided free of charge as their is competition for the beer from animal food producers to RipCell, another Scottish company in this sector. Perhaps we are wrong, but it be nice to know what the costs are.
Proposed 2nd plant
The originally site proposed for the second plant was abandoned. The landscape has changed as the original petrochemical plant at Grangemouth closes after 100 years, creating a new opportunity for a low carbon manufacturing hub as analysed in Project Willow Report. It is not clear but it seems that this is now where CR propose to situate their second plant.
Furthermore, according to the company's newsletter that launched the spring crowdfunding in 2024, the company expects to have 4 more plants each capable of producing up to 8,000 tons of product per year between 2024 and 2029 (8-10x the capacity of our first plant). However, the new plants don't need to be 8 - 10 times larger than the original. The first two of the new plants will be “Build, Own, Operate” and the last two joint Venture business models. With these in place they target to achieve revenues of over £120m by 2029.
Further fundraising
As part of the enticement to crowdfund shareholders to invest again in 2024, the Company mentioned its expansion plans, and also that it was raising £6m of capital of the spring/summer 2024. In addition, it was looking for Phase B funding to the tune of £25m, due to be concluded in September 2024 , would fund the business for the next 2 years ie to September 2026, but NOT funding of any new refineries.
Since that announcement in spring 2024, we've not had an update on the success or otherwise of the fund raising. Furthermore, the CFO that came into partly to manage this process only a year or so early, departed the company in April.
So what are we to conclude? How much does a plant cost? What does the feed for the plant cost? What assumptions can we make about the £129m turnover due to be recorded in 2029? Can we expect a 50% gross margin (£65m?) Admin costs £24m (£12m/year). Interest on borrowing - £5m? Who knows?
But let's say that 'the business', in whatever shape or form it may be, makes £40m profit before tax (after interest). 4.5million shares. That's just under £10 earnings per share! But the fact is, we're having to second guess when anything is happening, when to expect a profit and any form of dividend, and when we might actually get our money back.
18 September 2025
In my post today in the live feed, I mention that I had been intending to share some of my musings while we await the publication of the annual report. Celtic Renewables are legally obliged to send all shareholders a copy - Prepare annual accounts for a private limited company: Overview - GOV.UK. So I look forward to that . If I don't receive a copy I will download one from Companies House and share with you.
Needless to say, it is of concern that the company has not managed to attract the Series B funding of £35m that they started last year. It seems to be a widespread problem at the moment: funds are more weary of investing in the current economic climate, even when we have a Labour Government which is pro renewable energy and the circular economy. Furthermore, with Britain needing to fill a growing spending gap with potential new tax rises, you can see why the market is slowing down, despite there being a clear demand for CR's products.
In the meantime, they use the small shareholders like us for top-up funding to keep the company afloat as they did last year. They could not have risked asking us for more this year as ' whilst in the first half of 2025, the company has made significant progress on multiple fronts, the investment market in the UK is in one of the worst positions for decades due to geopolitical, macroeconomic and national economy issues' as they wrote to some of their shareholders.'
I know from speaking to other investors that they are not being honest with us the ordinary shareholders. Remember the Abundance Shareholders? Well, they voted last year to defer interest repayments until September this year, and they are now being asked to to defer this again until 2027. £4,497,674 interest is owed and being deferred, accruing 9% interest each year. Now, I don't want to make things worse for Celtic Renewables, because I believe in them. However, they have not mentioned any of this to us. To give you an example of how difficult things have been, this is how they introduced the idea of deferring the interest payments two days ago to their Abundance shareholders: ''It is only in the last fortnight that a way forward for the future survival of the company has become
clear, which also needs you as investors to be willing to give us more time. We are relieved to have a proposal to put to you notwithstanding our regret for the lack of communication and the fact that we are not able to pay you the interest we owe at the end of this month as we had intended. ''
I guess the Abundance shareholders have no choice but to accept. The growth we all expected is being postponed by another 2-3 years while we wait for the super plant to be funded, built, tested etc. These are the times we live in. But when you write to 'Investor Relations' all you will receive if you're lucky is an anonymous reply. It is not good enough.